The History Of All Hitherto Existing Marxism Is The History Of The Use Of The Word Hitherto
April 11, 2008
Is there some unwritten code of Marxist discourse that, following Marx and Engel’s fondness for the word, one must use the word hitherto as much as is possible? This is especially the case when one is summarising one’s argument, for example, in an abstract. Is this very much like the way in which Pauline scholars insist on throwing “by no means!” into every chapter a few times, an irksome habit recalled from my undergraduate days?
Suggestions as to similar tropes in other discourses will be taken. However, those refering to those of postmodernism, particularly to those of high academic postmodernism, will be ignored and deleted – shooting fish in a barrel.
2 Comments
leave one →
In Wittgensteinian scholarship: How about putting “Now I can Go On!” in chapter/subheadings regarding Wittgenstein’s counting example from PI.
Can’t think of any others right now…
Also in Wittgenstein: ‘we are inclined to say’… Actually, that may just be me writing it every autumn (because I am inclined to use my summers by climbing a mountain in Norway to read his books on it).
I’ve noticed that I often adopt the style of whatever I’m reading at the time. The most comic example of which was when I wrote something about critical theory whilst reading PG Wodehouse.